146 WHO Surgical Checklist Compliance and Attention Rates Among Different Specialties and Years

Aim

This study aims to evaluate the compliance of surgical staff to the WHO surgical safety checklist, excluding sign-out. The quality of surgical marks and inattentive rates of surgical staff during me-out were also investigated.

Method

Data was collected over 3 weeks using a fixed criteria in September 2022 within 3 hospitals consisting of 5 sites. A total of 105 procedures were observed. Mean and confidence intervals were calculated using SPSS.

Results

The mean compliance rate of the checklist was 97%. Sign-in (97%), Time-Out (96%), and Surgical mark rates (98%) all scored similarly.

Among specialties observed, interventional cardiology scored the highest compliance rates, at 100%, while cardiothoracic surgery scored the lowest at 91%. In 38% of procedures observed, surgical staff were found to be inattentive during me-out. Among the inattentive surgical staff, 73% of surgical staff had mild inattentiveness (e.g. filling up drug charts), 18% had moderate inattentiveness (e.g. talking to other staff), 9.1% of them had severe inattentiveness (e.g. scrubbing in).

Among the audit cycles from 2014 to 2022, there was an increase in sign-in rates from the previous cycle held in 2019 to 2022 from 82% to 97%. Inattentive rates increased from 33% in 2019 cycle to 38% in 2022 cycle.

Conclusions

This study reports high compliance rates and improvement with the checklist among all specialties, but also high inattentive rates by surgical staff. Improvements such as fostering a good culture among surgical staff on the WHO checklist and paying attention are key in never reducing events.