DOI: 10.69554/zmqc4019 ISSN: 2047-1319
The AI-powered archivist: Harnessing generative artificial intelligence for streamlined archival description
Anna Gibson Hollow, Lindsay Cline, Mohsen Kardar, Olesya Komarnytska, Laurel Warkentin This paper describes the Generative AI and Description Project started by the University of Alberta Archives team in January 2024. Stemming from a curiosity to explore the ways in which generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can be incorporated into daily workflows, the project sought to find ways of streamlining and saving time on some of the more laborious tasks of archival description. The team focused the implementation of GenAI tools on the creation of biographical sketches and administrative histories. Three GenAI tools were chosen, based on their open access and familiarity to most — ChatGPT, Perplexity AI and Microsoft’s CoPilot. Person and organisation-based entities were selected for the trials. As the project progressed, detailed processing notes were taken to track the accuracy of each tool used in the development of an appropriate and useful biographical sketch or administrative history. The results indicated a varying degree of inconsistency and fabrication (ie errors or inaccurate information) across the three tools, highlighting the need for staff to proofread and confirm the validity of sources; thus, not saving significant time in the end. The goal of this project was to provide other archives professionals with specific examples of practical applications of GenAI tools in archival description workflows. We hope that this project can inspire others to explore other ways in which GenAI can become a part of our professional practices. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection, which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169349700600104 2025
Creating and Fostering Fan Identification in Professional Sports William A. Sutton, Mark A McDonald, George R. Milne
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169340301200102 2025
Sport Spectator Consumption Behavior Galen T. Trail, Janet S. Fink, Dean F. Anderson
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169349600500407 2025
A Functional Model of Fan Attendance Motivations for College Football Lynn R. Kahle, Kenneth M. Kambara, Gregory M. Rose
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169340201100104 2025
Characterizing Consumer Motivation as Individual Difference Factors: Augmenting the Sport Interest Inventory (SII) to Explain Level of Spectator Support Daniel C. Funk, Daniel F. Mahony, Lynn Ridinger
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169340000900103 2025
Using the Psychological Commitment to Team (PCT) Scale to Segment Sport Consumers Based on Loyalty Daniel F. Mahony, Robert Madrigal, Dennis Howard
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169349500400405 2025
Variables Affecting the Spectator Decision to Attend NBA Games James J. Zhang, Dale C. Pease, Stanley C. Hui, Thomas J. Michaud
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169340301200404 2025
Motives and Points of Attachment: Fans versus Spectators in Intercollegiate Athletics Galen T. Trail, Matthew J. Robinson, Ronald J. Dick, Andrew J. Gillentine
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169349900800103 2025
Examining the Importance of Brand Equity in Professional Sport lames M. Gladden, George R. Milne
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169340501400204 2025
Consumer Satisfaction and Identity Theory: A Model of Sport Spectator Conative Loyalty Galen T. Trail, Dean F. Anderson, Janet S. Fink
-
DOI: 10.1177/106169340401300103 2025
Comparing Sport Consumer Motivations across Multiple Sports Jeffrey D. James, Stephen D. Ross