DOI: 10.1002/jimd.12671 ISSN:

Collaborative evaluation study on 18 candidate diseases for newborn screening in 1.77 million samples

Esther M. Maier, Ulrike Mütze, Nils Janzen, Ulrike Steuerwald, Uta Nennstiel, Birgit Odenwald, Elfriede Schuhmann, Amelie S. Lotz‐Havla, Katharina J. Weiss, Johanna Hammersen, Corina Weigel, Eva Thimm, Sarah C. Grünert, Julia B. Hennermann, Peter Freisinger, Johannes Krämer, Anibh M. Das, Sabine Illsinger, Gwendolyn Gramer, Junmin Fang‐Hoffmann, Sven F. Garbade, Jürgen G. Okun, Georg F. Hoffmann, Stefan Kölker, Wulf Röschinger
  • Genetics (clinical)
  • Genetics
Show PDF Cite

Abstract

Analytical and therapeutic innovations led to a continuous but variable extension of newborn screening (NBS) programs worldwide. Every extension requires a careful evaluation of feasibility, diagnostic (process) quality, and possible health benefits to balance benefits and limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of 18 candidate diseases for inclusion in NBS programs. Utilising tandem mass spectrometry as well as establishing specific diagnostic pathways with second‐tier analyses, three German NBS centres designed and conducted an evaluation study for 18 candidate diseases, all of them inherited metabolic diseases. In total, 1,777,264 NBS samples were analysed. Overall, 441 positive NBS results were reported resulting in 68 confirmed diagnoses, 373 false‐positive cases, and an estimated cumulative prevalence of approximately 1 in 26,000 newborns. The positive predictive value ranged from 0.07 (carnitine transporter defect) to 0.67 (HMG‐CoA lyase deficiency). Three individuals were missed, and fourteen individuals (21%) developed symptoms before the positive NBS results were reported. The majority of tested candidate diseases was found to be suitable for inclusion in NBS programs, while multiple acyl‐CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, isolated methylmalonic acidurias, propionic acidemia, and malonyl‐CoA decarboxylase deficiency showed some and carnitine transporter defect significant limitations. Evaluation studies are an important tool to assess the potential benefits and limitations of expanding NBS programs to new diseases.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

More from our Archive