Administrative coding of frailty: Its association with clinical outcomes and resource use in kidney transplantationSaad Mallick, Sara Sakowitz, Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar, Nikhil Chervu, Alberto Valenzuela, Shineui Kim, Peyman Benharash
Although not formalized into current risk assessment models, frailty has been associated with negative postoperative outcomes in many specialties. However, national analyses of the association between frailty and post‐transplant outcomes following kidney transplantation (KT) are lacking.
This was a retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing KT from 2016 to 2020 in the Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Frailty was defined using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator.
Of an estimated 95 765 patients undergoing KT during the study period, 4918 (5.1%) were frail. After risk adjustment, frail patients were associated with significantly higher odds of in‐hospital mortality (AOR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.33–3.57) compared to their non‐frail counterparts. Our findings indicate that frail patients had an average increase in postoperative hospital stay of 1.44 days, a $2300 increase in hospitalization costs, as well as higher odds of developing a major perioperative complication as compared to their non‐frail counterparts. Frailty was also associated with greater adjusted risk of non‐home discharge.
Frailty, as identified by administrative coding, is independently associated with worse surgical outcomes, including increased mortality and resource use, in adults undergoing KT. Given the already limited donor organ pool, novel efforts are needed to ensure adequate optimization and timely post‐transplantation care of the growing frail cohort undergoing KT.