Nationally Representative Trends in Incidence of Procedures Done Concomitantly With Primary and Revision Total Ankle From 2012 to 2020
Albert T. Anastasio, Kempland C. Walley, Billy I. Kim, Mikhail A. Bethell, Samuel B. Adams- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Podiatry
- Surgery
Background
As new literature emerges and practice patterns fluctuate, there is a significant potential for variation with regard to adjunctive procedures performed with primary total ankle arthroplasty (pTAA) and revision total ankle arthroplasty (rTAA). Our study aims to evaluate yearly trends in the incidence of concomitant procedures and compare the incidence of adjunctive procedures between pTAA and rTAA.
Methods
The 2012-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all pTAA and rTAA. The number of concurrent procedures was compared between pTAA and rTAA and compared across years available in the most current version of the NSQIP database (2012-2020).
Results
Patients undergoing pTAA had a higher mean age than patients undergoing rTAA (64 vs 61 years; P < .001), and patients undergoing rTAA had higher wound class (P < .001), indicating higher levels of contamination. Concurrent procedures were performed significantly less frequently with pTAA than rTAA (mean procedures 0.82 vs 1.30; P < .001). Removal of deep implants was more commonly coded with rTAA than pTAA (9.0% vs 17.7%; P < .001). Gastrocnemius recession was more frequently performed with pTAA than rTAA (10.4% vs 3.0%; P = .001).
Conclusion
As pTAA and rTAA increase in incidence throughout the United States, there is increased importance on furthering our understanding of these procedures. This study provides a nationally representative analysis of adjunctive procedures with pTAA and rTAA from 2012 to 2020. Generally, more adjunctive procedures are performed with rTAA versus pTAA, confirming the high complexity of rTAA.
Levels of Evidence:
Level III