Are changes in muscular strength following head‐down bed rest independently associated with improved cognitive function in older adults? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Jammy Zou, Ryan S Falck, Guilherme Moraes Balbim, Jennifer C Davis, Kenneth Madden, Todd C Handy, Teresa Liu‐Ambrose- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Geriatrics and Gerontology
- Neurology (clinical)
- Developmental Neuroscience
- Health Policy
- Epidemiology
Abstract
Background
Physical inactivity is common among older adults and is a risk factor for cognitive decline. Even a brief period of physical inactivity, such as bed rest due to hospitalization, in older adults has significant negative impacts. Exercise is strategy to counter the negative effects of physical inactivity. Exercise‐induced improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with improved cognitive function. Less is known regarding the contribution of exercise‐induced changes in muscle strength to changes in cognitive function. Thus, we aimed to examine the independent contribution of: 1) change in cardiorespiratory fitness; and 2) change in peak muscle torque of the lower extremity to changes in cognitive function in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of head‐down bed rest (HDBR) vs. HDBR with exercise in healthy older adults.
Method
An analysis of a non‐blinded, parallel‐group, RCT of 22 healthy older adults (11 males and 11 females) aged 55‐65 years. Participants were randomized to: 1) 14 days of 6° HDBR (CON); or 2) HDBR with daily resistance and aerobic exercise training (EX). Outcome measures were taken at baseline and HDBR completion. The Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Task measured executive function. Physical fitness measures included: 1) maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) using a bicycle ergometry test; and 2) knee extension isokinetic muscular strength (KE) using a Biodex dynamometer. We performed two separate multiple linear regressions to determine whether following 14 days of HDBR: 1) VO2max was associated with Flanker score, after accounting for ΔKE; and 2) KE was associated with Flanker score, after accounting for ΔVO2max. Each model was also adjusted for baseline Flanker score and the baseline physical fitness measure of interest.
Result
At baseline, average Flanker t‐score was 48.33, mean VO2max was 32.527 ml/kg/min, and knee extension strength was 64.472 Nm. VO2max at follow‐up was not significantly associated with Flanker performance (b = 0.232 ± 0.716; p = 0.635; R2 adj. = 0.285). However, greater KE strength was significantly associated with better Flanker performance (b = 2.023 ± 0.389; p = 0.043; R2 adj. = 0.633) at HDBR completion.
Conclusion
The maintenance of muscle strength even during brief periods of physical inactivity appears to be critical for cognitive health in older adults.