DOI: 10.1111/vru.13291 ISSN:

ACVR and ECVDI consensus statement: Reporting elements for toxicity criteria of the veterinary radiation therapy oncology group v2.0

Valerie J. Poirier, Michele Keyerleber, Ira K. Gordon, Michelle M. Turek, Michael S. Kent, Ellison Bentley, Jessica Lawrence
  • General Veterinary

Abstract

The toxicity criteria of the veterinary radiation therapy oncology group (VRTOG) version 2 guidelines are a substantial update to reflect significant advances in radiation oncology over the last three decades. Radiation therapy techniques provide precise and spatially accurate radiation delivery, which facilitates treating tumors in more anatomic locations and incorporating hypofractionated protocols. The purpose of this update is to aid radiation oncology teams in capturing and grading clinically relevant data that impacts the decision‐making process in everyday practice and the assessment of clinical trials involving radiation therapy. A dedicated committee initially updated the criteria to include more anatomical sites and grades to characterize a broad spectrum of possible radiation‐induced acute and late tissue changes. Through the revision process, which solicited and incorporated feedback from all radiation oncologists within the American College of Veterinary Radiology (ACVR) and specialists outside the ACVR, the authors endeavored to create a grading structure reflective of clinical decision‐making in daily radiation oncology. The updated VRTOG v2 toxicity criteria guideline complements the updated Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group‐Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (VCOG‐CTCAE v2) guidelines. Because radiation oncology continues to progress rapidly, the VRTOG toxicity criteria should be regularly updated as adverse event data that will be collected following this update further informs the practice of radiation oncology.

More from our Archive