Validation of a Low-Cost Accelerometry Device for Cycle-Based Biomechanical Analysis of Deep-Water Running
Caroline C. B. Souza, Franciele Parolini, Márcio Fagundes Goethel, Johan Robalino, Gisela Rocha de Siqueira, Alysson L. P. C. Silva, Marcus Vinícius B. Rodrigues, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, Miguel Velhote Correia, Marco Aurélio Benedetti Rodrigues, Ana Paula de Lima FerreiraHydrotherapy is widely used in rehabilitation because it reduces mechanical loading while preserving neuromuscular and cardiovascular stimulation. However, the biomechanical characterization of deep-water running remains limited, particularly when using accessible wearable systems for cycle-based movement analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the concurrent validity and agreement of a low-cost accelerometry device for cycle-based analysis of deep-water running, using a commercial accelerometry system as the reference measurement system. Twenty-one healthy participants performed a 25 m deep-water running task with simultaneous data acquisition from mechanically coupled sensors to ensure alignment. A total of 75 synchronized cycles were processed using a standardized pipeline that included filtering, synchronization, cycle detection, and parameter extraction. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman’s correlation, Bland–Altman analysis, and error metrics. The results showed good agreement for temporal and volumetric variables, including cycle duration (ICC = 0.84), cumulative acceleration (ICC = 0.82), and area under the curve (ICC = 0.68). However, lower agreement and systematic bias were observed for intensity-related variables, particularly RMS and peak acceleration, despite more than 92% of cycles falling within the 95% limits of agreement (LoA). These findings suggest that the proposed device provides acceptable agreement for temporal and volumetric variables during deep-water running and may represent a low-cost alternative for movement monitoring in aquatic environments. However, intensity-related variables should be interpreted with caution due to the systematic differences observed between systems.