Validation and evaluation of weather-based predictive decision support systems for frogeye leaf spot of soybean in the United States
José F. González-Acuña, Tom Allen, Mandy Bish, Carl Bradley, Boris Xavier Camiletti, Martin I. Chilvers, Nabin Kumar Dangal, Maira Duffeck, Gabriel Dusek, Ahmad Fakhoury, Travis R. Faske, LeAnn Lux, Dylan Mangel, Daren S. Mueller, Paul Price, Hope Renfroe-Becton, Madalyn Shires, Damon L. Smith, Darcy E. P. Telenko, Richard Wade WebsterFrogeye leaf spot (FLS), caused by Cercospora sojina Hara, is a major foliar disease of soybeans (Glycine max) worldwide. While a fungicide application is often recommended at the beginning of the pod fill (R3) growth stage, farmers lack a decision-support system (DSS) to guide whether and when to apply. A model consisting of three risk-based action thresholds was developed in 2024, and field trials were performed in 2024 and 2025 across 37 site-years and 15 states to validate it. Our objectives were to evaluate the effects of DSS-based fungicide applications on FLS suppression and yield protection, and to assess the predictive model's performance under field conditions. FLS severity levels were low in most site-years. In a combined-environment analysis of FLS severity, spraying at the R3 growth stage, and at a 40% or 50% action threshold outperformed the non-treated control (NTC). Yield was improved in the R3 application and low-threshold treatments compared to the NTC. At individual site-years, the model performed as well as the standard R3 spray in most sites but overestimated FLS risk in others. Overall model accuracy at the highest-risk threshold reached 86% and performed better at the lower FLS severity sites than at higher severity sites. Sensitivity was best with the lowest-risk action threshold, while specificity reached 100% at the highest-risk action threshold. This work is the first attempt to develop and implement a DSS based on predictive models for timing fungicide applications for FLS in the U.S.