Use of reverse noise to measure ongoing delay

Counts of spike coincidences provide a powerful means to compare responses to different stimuli or of different neurons, particularly regarding temporal factors. A drawback is that these methods do not provide an absolute measure of latency, i.e., the temporal interval between stimulus features and response. It is desirable to have such a measure within the analysis framework of coincidence counting. Single neuron responses were obtained, from 130 fibers in several tracts (auditory nerve, trapezoid body, lateral lemniscus), to a broadband noise and its polarity-inverted version. The spike trains in response to these stimuli are the “forward noise” responses. The same stimuli were also played time-reversed. The resulting spike trains were then again time-reversed: These are the “reverse-noise” responses. The forward and reverse responses were then analyzed with the coincidence count methods we have introduced earlier. Correlograms between forward- and reverse-noise responses show maxima at values consistent with latencies measured with other methods; the pattern of latencies with characteristic frequency, sound pressure level, and recording location was also consistent. At low characteristic frequencies, correlograms were well-predicted by reverse-correlation functions. We conclude that reverse noise provides an easy and reliable means to estimate latency of auditory nerve and brainstem neurons.