DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000001435 ISSN: 1538-4683

Updates on Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Aortic Stenosis

Hadi Itani, Mohamad B. Moumneh, Ahmed Zayed, Arun Gajan Pradeep, Mohammad Ennab, Bahy Abofrekha, Omar Khaya, Jonathan Spagnola, William H. Frishman, Wilbert S. Aronow

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common degenerative valvular disease in elderly patients and is linked to high morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification are critical for effective management. Transthoracic echocardiography is the standard diagnostic tool, but its reliance on flow-dependent parameters can lead to inconsistent grading, especially in low-flow, low-gradient, or normal-flow, low-gradient AS. Advanced echocardiographic methods, such as 3D imaging, stress echocardiography, and Doppler indices, such as the mean gradient-to-effective orifice area ratio, improve the evaluation of AS severity and assist in clinical decision-making. Computed tomography provides a flow-independent evaluation of AS. It uses noncontrast calcium scoring with sex-specific thresholds, along with contrast-enhanced angiography, for detailed anatomical assessment. These modalities are essential for procedural planning, particularly for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides additional prognostic information. It quantifies myocardial remodeling and fibrosis, which are associated with outcomes and recovery potential. Emerging technologies are expanding diagnostic capabilities in AS. Examples include 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography for detecting microcalcification, artificial intelligence–based ECG and echocardiography for early diagnosis, and 4D flow CMR. Integration of echocardiography, computed tomography, CMR, and emerging positron emission tomography and artificial intelligence–based approaches can help address diagnostic uncertainty. This integration helps refine AS subtype classification and inform individualized intervention strategies.

More from our Archive