Universal videolaryngoscopy and intubation outcomes in anaesthesia trainees: A subanalysis of the multicentre VIDEOLAR-SURGERY trial
María Bermúdez, Manuel Taboada, Jorge Fernández, Ana Estany-Gestal, Emma Paz, Nieves Molíns, María de los Ángeles Orallo, Eva Mosquera, Marcos Amor, Cora Díaz, Paula Mirón, Laura Dos Santos, Rosa Soto-Jove, María Concepción Alonso, Juan José Amate, Sergio Varela, Cristina Taboada, Teresa Seoane-Pillado
Tracheal intubation is a core procedural skill in anaesthesia training. Videolaryngoscopy provides improved glottic visualisation and shared airway views, but its effect on trainee-performed intubations in routine clinical practice remains uncertain. This subanalysis of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised before-and-after study evaluated whether adopting videolaryngoscopy as the universal first-intention device improved intubation performance among anaesthesia trainees. Eight hospitals in Northwest Spain contributed 1801 trainee-performed intubations (857 before and 944 after intervention). During the non-intervention phase, direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade was used, whereas the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope was systematically adopted during the intervention phase. The primary outcome was easy intubation, defined as first-attempt success, Cormack–Lehane grade I–IIa view and no adjunct use. Easy intubation occurred more frequently with videolaryngoscopy (83.1% vs 69.3%;