Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Pure Aortic Regurgitation: The Randomized SEASON-AR Clinical Trial
Xiao-Fei Gao, Yan Wang, Hong Jiang, Bo Li, Yi-Bing Shao, Jun Luo, Fa-Xin Ren, Fan Ouyang, Zhi-Kui Chen, Hai-Tao Yuan, Cheng Wang, Bing Han, Ping-Xi Xiao, Yi-Qiang Yuan, Zhen-Wen Yang, Liu Miao, Xiang Ma, Jian Yang, Dong-Fang You, Shao-Liang Chen, Jun-Jie Zhang,BACKGROUND:
For patients with severe pure aortic regurgitation (AR) at high surgical risk, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is often the only available option. Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for aortic stenosis and has also been evaluated in patients with pure AR. However, no adequately powered randomized trial has compared TAVR with GDMT alone in this population.
METHODS:
We conducted a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial in China. Patients with severe pure AR for whom surgery was considered difficult or unacceptable by the local heart team or who persistently declined surgery were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive transfemoral TAVR with the VitaFlow system plus GDMT or GDMT alone. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year.
RESULTS:
We assigned 210 patients with severe pure AR to the TAVR group (n=109) or GDMT group (n=101) at 18 centers. At 1-year follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the primary end point was significantly lower in the TAVR group than in the GDMT group (8.3% vs 24.8%; hazard ration [HR], 0.31 [95% CI, 0.14–0.66];
CONCLUSIONS:
Among patients with severe pure AR, TAVR plus GDMT significantly reduced the rate of all-cause death, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year compared with GDMT alone despite higher 30-day rates of major or life-threatening bleeding and new permanent pacemaker implantation.
REGISTRATION:
URL: