The Role of Ankle–Foot Orthoses in Improving Gait in Children and Adolescents with Neuromotor Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: International guidelines recommend the use of orthoses in subjects with cerebral palsy (CP), even though there is limited evidence of their effectiveness. Little is known about their effectiveness in children and adolescents with other types of neuromotor disability. Methods: The review protocol was recorded on the PROSPERO register (CRD42024509165) and conformed to the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were any type of ankle–foot orthoses (AFOs); pediatric subjects with any non-acquired neuromotor disease; any type of outcome measure regarding gait performance; controlled studies; and those in the English language. Screening, selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction were performed by a group of independent researchers. Results: Fifty-seven reports were included, with most regarding CP; three involved subjects with Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease or Duchenne dystrophy. Nine were RCTs. A meta-analysis was performed for studies including subjects with CP. The meta-analysis demonstrated the effectiveness of AFOs in increasing stride length (MD −10.21 [−13.92, −6.51]), ankle dorsiflexion at IC (MD 9.66 [7.05, 12.27]), and peak ankle DF in stance (MD 5.72 [2.34, 9.09]) while reducing cadence (MD 0.13 [0.06, 0.17]) and the energy cost of walking (MD −0.02 [−0.03, −0.00]). The peak ankle power generated at push-off was significantly increased with flexible AFOs compared to rigid AFOs (MD 0.38 [0.30, 0.46]), but it decreased with both compared to walking barefoot or with shoes (MD −0.35 [−0.49, −0.22]). Evidence regarding DMD and CMT was limited but suggested opting for individualized flexible AFOs, which preserved peak ankle power generation. Conclusions: AFOs improve gait performance in CP. Flexible AFOs are preferable because they preserve the peak ankle power generated at push-off compared to rigid AFOs.