DOI: 10.3390/math14162921 ISSN: 2227-7390

The Optimal and Robust Siting and Ranking Framework for ESS and STATCOM Under 765 kV Double-Circuit N-2 Contingencies

Minsoo Kim, Minkyu Jung, Hyeonjun Im, Minyoung Lee, Duehee Lee

We propose an optimal and robust siting and ranking framework for energy storage systems (ESSs) and static synchronous compensators (STATCOMs) under 765 kV double-circuit N-2 contingencies in the Republic of Korea transmission lines. Each N-2 contingency is constructed by pairing two parallel circuits that share the same 765 kV sending and receiving substations, so the contingency set is enumerated directly from the network topology. The framework screens 765 kV candidate buses at a fixed reference capacity, and it sizes ESS and STATCOM supports through independent active- and reactive-power capacity sweeps of repeated static post-contingency AC power flows. Then, it ranks candidates by a rank-aggregated robust score that combines scenario-averaged severity, scenario-averaged improvement, and evaluation reliability. Each sweep exercises only the non-negative support direction of its resource, namely ESS discharge and capacitive STATCOM operation, which is stated as an explicit modeling assumption. Here, robust means averaged over the multi-scenario set of the study year, load level, planning condition, and HVDC state rather than the worst-case in the min–max sense. The framework shows that the bus, which performs best on individual contingency pairs, does not coincide with the bus that is robust across scenarios, and it separately identifies the most frequent worst pair and the most difficult pair without relying on substation names. It therefore recommends the scenario-robust bus rather than the single-pair winner, orders candidates by the rank-aggregated robust score, and gives a STATCOM-leaning ESS–STATCOM mix at the top of the ranking under a transparent cost proxy, weight, cost-ratio, and coverage assumption. Therefore, the recommendation stays reproducible under alternative planning inputs.

More from our Archive