The Latest Advances in Rosacea Treatment: A Systematic Review
Anastazja Andrusiewicz, Sofiia Khimuk, Jakub Niżnik, Dmytro Sirko, Daniel Mijas, Danuta NowickaBackground: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis characterized by vascular dysregulation, immune dysfunction, neurovascular alterations, and microbial involvement. Recent advances in understanding its pathophysiology have led to the development of targeted therapeutic strategies addressing multiple disease mechanisms. This systematic review aimed to evaluate contemporary evidence regarding emerging and established treatment approaches for rosacea. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between 2016 and 2025. Original human studies evaluating therapeutic interventions for rosacea were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools appropriate for each study design. Results: Fifteen studies involving 537 patients with rosacea and 77 controls (614 participants in total) met the eligibility criteria. Evaluated interventions included vascular-targeted therapies, topical anti-inflammatory agents, systemic and immunomodulatory treatments, and microbiome-oriented approaches. Oxymetazoline, pulsed-dye laser, platelet-rich plasma, ivermectin, azelaic acid, dapsone, sulfur preparations, and metronidazole demonstrated clinical benefits in reducing erythema, inflammatory lesions, or overall disease severity. Emerging therapies, including tofacitinib and oral ivermectin, showed promising results in refractory disease. Microbiome-related interventions, particularly Demodex-targeted therapies and Helicobacter pylori eradication, were also associated with clinical improvement. Risk-of-bias assessment identified two studies with low risk of bias, twelve with moderate risk of bias, and one study with high risk of bias. Conclusions: Current evidence supports a multimodal and mechanism-based approach to rosacea management, integrating vascular, inflammatory, immunological, and microbiological targets. However, the available evidence remains limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous methodologies, short follow-up periods, and a predominance of non-randomized study designs. Large, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to establish optimal evidence-based treatment strategies and define the long-term efficacy and safety of emerging therapies.