The Influence of Material and Veneering Technique on the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns
Nader Abdulhameed, Jean Francois Roulet, Hind Hussein, Zahraa Mahdi, Noor Ibrahim, Taiseer Sulaiman, Emmanouil-George Tzanakakis, Panagiotis ZoidisBackground: There are certain disadvantages to using CAD/CAM technologies. Marginal and internal accuracy of fit is valued as one of the most important criteria for the clinical quality and success of all-ceramic crowns. The assessment of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate and zirconia CAD/CAM crowns before and after ceramic layering is crucial. Methods: One ideally prepared model tooth was duplicated into 64 plaster models. A standardized wax pattern for a monolithic crown and a coping were produced and used to mill 16 lithium disilicate monolithic crowns and 16 cores using a soft milling process. 16 zirconia crowns and 16 cores were also fabricated. A factorial design with (material) (lithium disilicate [E] or zirconia [Z]); (design) (monolithic, [M] or (core) [C]); and (finish) (as-produced [P] or veneered/glazed [G]) was used to create the following groups: ZMP, ZMG, ZCP, ZCG, EMP, EMG, ECP, and ECG (n = 8). The milled restorations were treated accordingly using ZirLiner, IPS e.max Ceram, and IPS e.max Glaze. The restorations were cemented to their dies, embedded in epoxy resin, and sectioned into two planes with a diamond saw. Vertical and horizontal marginal fit at the finishing line was measured in a standardized way at four locations (mesial, distal, facial, and lingual). Results: There were no differences, p > 0.05, between all Z groups; however, they had significantly wider horizontal gaps, p < 0.05, (116 ± 5 µm) than E groups (64 ± 13 µm). Among lithium disilicate groups, the glazed monolithic (EMG) and veneered/glazed coping (ECG) subgroups showed significantly smaller horizontal gaps (approximately 50 ± 6 µm). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with a significance level set at α = 0.05. Conclusions: Veneering techniques did not affect zirconia. Lithium disilicate had a better marginal fit than zirconia, but this was influenced by veneering techniques. Lithium disilicate veneering and/or glazing significantly improved the marginal fit.