The Importance of Instrumentation Length in Ankylosing Spinal Disorders and Thoracolumbar Fractures
Federico Fusini, Alessandro Rava, Giosuè Gargiulo, Domenico Messina, Alberto Lorenzi, Silvia Amico, Gabriele Colò, Massimo GirardoBackground/Objectives: Ankylosing Spinal Disorders (ASDs) encompass a heterogeneous group of rheumatic diseases characterized by progressive ankylosis of the axial skeleton, including Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH), and Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis (nr-AxSpA). Spinal ankylosis profoundly alters the biomechanical properties of the vertebral column, transforming it into a rigid long-bone equivalent and dramatically increasing fracture risk even after low-energy trauma. Once a fracture occurs, the long lever arm created by the ankylosed segments generates enormous mechanical stress at the fracture site, making surgical stabilization mandatory in the vast majority of cases. Long posterior instrumentation is the treatment of choice; however, no consensus exists regarding the optimal number of instrumented levels. The aim of this study is to clinically and radiologically evaluate long posterior instrumentation in the 3 + 3 (3 proximal and 3 caudal screws), 3 + 2 (3 proximal and 2 caudal screws), or 2 + 2 (2 proximal and 2 caudal screws) configuration for the treatment of traumatic ASD thoracolumbar vertebral fractures, in terms of implant failure, infection rate, and mortality. Methods: Between 2018 and 2023, 65 consecutive patients with ASD-related thoracolumbar vertebral fractures were treated at our institution. After applying pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 patients were enrolled. Patients were retrospectively divided into three groups according to the posterior arthrodesis configuration (notation indicates number of instrumented vertebral levels proximal + distal to the fracture: 3 + 3, 3 + 2, or 2 + 2). Radiological outcomes were assessed for loosening, screw cut-out, and implant breakage. Infection and mortality rates within 3 months from surgery were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test (significance set at p < 0.05). Results: Thirty-seven patients (28 males and 9 females; mean age 77 ± 7.3 years) were included, with a mean follow-up of 30 ± 5.3 months. Instrumentation configurations were as follows: 23 (3 + 3), 5 (3 + 2), and 9 (2 + 2). Three implant failures (8.1%) and four infections (10.8%) were recorded. Eleven patients died within 3 months of surgery. A statistically significant difference was found between instrumentation length and mechanical complications (p = 0.0468), while no significant difference was observed for infection (p = 1) or mortality rate (p = 0.137). Conclusions: In this exploratory retrospective cohort, the 3 + 3 configuration was associated with the lowest observed rate of implant failure in ASD thoracolumbar fractures, suggesting a potential mechanical advantage over shorter constructs that warrants confirmation in larger prospective studies. No significant correlation was found between instrumentation length and infection rate or early mortality. Prospective, multicentre studies with larger cohorts are warranted to establish definitive guidelines for instrumentation length in this challenging patient population.