The extended universe of uneven datafication

In this commentary on Azadeh Akbari's article, “Uneven Datafication,” I build on her work by offering further ways that the concept of uneven datafication can be used, developed, and elaborated. I briefly outline two different theoretical expansions built on Akbari's analysis of uneven datafication. First is the question of uneven legibility and the power of inscrutability—or how we account for negative cases when people and places are not subjected to datafication. Second is how uneven datafication fits into the longer history of development in various productive forces for the purpose of turning subjects into objects of value extraction. By fleshing out this extended universe of uneven datafication, I hope to add further depth and utility to Akbari's concept.