DOI: 10.1177/17562864261491047 ISSN: 1756-2864

Telitacicept as add-on therapy for myasthenic crisis: A retrospective cohort study

Jiamin Peng, Fangyi Shi, Cunzhou Shen, Yan Li, Rong Lai, Hongyan Zhou, Xunsha Sun, Li Feng, Huiyu Feng, Haiyan Wang

Background

Myasthenic crisis (MC) is a life-threatening exacerbation of myasthenia gravis (MG) that often requires mechanical ventilation (MV) and intensive care. Following acute stabilization, optimal maintenance immunotherapy remains uncertain in some patients.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of telitacicept as add-on treatment after antibody depletion therapy in patients with MC.

Design

A retrospective, non-randomized, single-center exploratory cohort study.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with MC treated after antibody depletion therapy at a single center between November 2022 and February 2023. Patients receiving add-on telitacicept plus conventional immunotherapy were compared with patients who received conventional immunotherapy alone. Efficacy was assessed by using changes from baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores, hospitalization-related outcomes, prednisone-equivalent dose, and safety.

Results

Eleven patients were enrolled. At months 1, 3, 6, and 12, median MG-ADL and QMG scores for both groups progressively decreased. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for either score at any time point ( p all > 0.05). A numerical trend towards greater reduction in MG-ADL and QMG scores was noted in the T-group from month 6 to month 12. No significant inter-group differences were found in median length of ICU stay, duration of MV, or length of hospitalization ( p all > 0.05). Prednisone dose was lower in the telitacicept group during early follow-up, but no significant between-group difference was observed at 12 months ( p > 0.05). No medication-related serious adverse events, allergic reactions, or infections were documented in either group during treatment or follow-up.

Conclusion

In this small retrospective exploratory cohort, no statistically significant inter-group differences were observed between telitacicept add-on therapy and conventional immunosuppression across the measured outcomes. Telitacicept may represent a potential strategy for long-term disease control after (MC), but these findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.