DOI: 10.1002/ptr.70421 ISSN: 0951-418X

Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis: Plant‐Based Therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Anselm Meyer, Jonas Auer, Lorena Cascant‐Ortolano, Niclas Schreiber, Amy Zimmermann‐Klemd, Carsten Gründemann, Philipp Busche, Jörg Schirra, Mark R. Fox

ABSTRACT

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of brain‐gut interaction that presents with abdominal pain, bloating associated with variable stool consistency. Many IBS patients prefer plant‐based preparations to pharmacological therapy; however, the utility of this approach is not well established. To address this issue, a systematic review with meta‐analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of plant‐based therapy in IBS patients was performed. Literature search with 3 electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Web of Science Core Collection) from inception to May 2024. Efficacy was assessed using dichotomous ratings of change in IBS symptoms. A random effects model with 95% confidence intervals was used. Through the screening process, 60 eligible studies were identified (6329 patients). Meta‐analysis was performed for fiber (8 studies, RR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.00–1.49), peppermint oil (7 studies, RR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.33–2.00), Aloe vera (3 studies, RR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.76–2.06), and Chinese herbal medicine (7 studies, RR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.27–1.92). For other plant‐based substances investigated in at least one randomized controlled trial (RCT) (e.g., St. John's wort, Anise oil), there were insufficient data for a meta‐analysis. The quality of many studies was limited. The findings demonstrate that the treatment of IBS patients with peppermint oil and Chinese herbal medicine were more effective than placebo and had a good safety profile. Dietary fiber showed effects that approached significance. Further, well‐powered RCTs are needed to establish the place of plant‐based preparations in IBS treatment.

More from our Archive