SWOT Assessment of Agricultural Water-Management Systems in Kazakhstan: Infrastructure, Institutional Constraints, and Strategic Development Directions
Natalya Gritsenko, Pavel Kalashnikov, Zhandiyar Yessen, Mariana Petrova, Kanat Tireuov, Zhibek Khussainova, Roza Bespayeva, Manuel Fernandez-Grela(1) Background: Kazakhstan’s agricultural sector is increasingly exposed to water scarcity, an aging irrigation infrastructure, climate change, and transboundary-water risks. (2) Methods: The study combines a cross-sectional infrastructure inventory as of 1 September 2024 with documentary evidence from 2010–2024. SWOT factors were extracted from infrastructure inventories, official water-sector documents, basin-inspectorate materials, and sector statistics and then screened for relevance and classified according to a consistent rule: strengths and weaknesses represent internal system characteristics, whereas opportunities and threats represent external conditions. Ambiguous factors were reassessed against this rule. The final factors were linked in a traceable TOWS cross-matrix to derive SO, WO, ST, and WT strategic directions. No quantitative weighting or ranking was applied; therefore, the resulting directions are interpreted as qualitative development areas rather than ranked priorities. (3) Results: The analysis identifies substantial regional differences in the scale and condition of reservoirs, hydraulic complexes, canals, pumping facilities, and drainage infrastructure. The main internal constraints are infrastructure deterioration, conveyance losses, limited metering, financing and maintenance constraints, and shortages of technical capacity. External opportunities include public investment, water-saving technologies, digital monitoring, and improved basin governance, whereas climate variability, transboundary dependence, inflationary pressure, and water-quality risks remain key threats. (4) Conclusions: Improving agricultural water security requires a shift from infrastructure expansion alone toward rehabilitation, demand-side efficiency, digital monitoring, basin-level governance, and climate and transboundary risk management.