Suture-Button Fixation Provides a Statistically But Not Clinically Important Improvement in Function for Syndesmotic Injuries in Unstable Ankle Fractures
Wayne Hoskins, Charles Gusho, Kevin Horner, Douglas HaaseBackground:
No consensus exists on the optimal syndesmotic fixation for unstable ankle fractures. We compared strategies using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods:
Seven databases and trial registers were searched through November 1, 2025 for RCTs of adults undergoing fixation of an ankle fracture with syndesmotic injury; quasirandomized and duplicate/follow-up reports were excluded. Interventions were grouped a priori as suture-button/dynamic fixation, metallic 3-cortex screw (reference), metallic 4-cortex screw, bioabsorbable screw, and no fixation. A frequentist random-effects NMA estimated mean differences (MD) for function (Olerud-Molander Ankle Score [OMAS] at 1 year, the outcome reported by the most trials; AOFAS) and odds ratios (OR) for malreduction and reoperation (primary definition excluding planned implant removal), with treatments ranked by P-score and effects interpreted against the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Certainty was rated with a CINeMA-equivalent assessment.
Results:
Twelve RCTs (883 patients) formed a connected network. For 1-year OMAS, suture-button fixation ranked highest (P-score 0.86; MD +5.2 points versus the 3-cortex screw; 95% CI, +1.1 to +9.2)—statistically significant but below the 10-point MCID—while the 4-cortex screw ranked lowest; heterogeneity was low (I 2 = 10%) without inconsistency. The AOFAS did not differ between suture-button and the 3-cortex screw (MD 0.0; 95% CI, −4.5 to +4.5). Malreduction was lower with suture-button fixation (OR 0.26; 95% CI, 0.06-1.11; 0.27 [0.11-0.64] fixed-effect). Unplanned reoperation was numerically lowest with suture-button fixation (OR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.11-1.05 versus the 3-cortex screw), though no between-construct difference reached significance; all-cause reoperation favored the suture-button and bioabsorbable constructs. Certainty of evidence was low to very low.
Conclusions:
Suture-button/dynamic fixation provides 1-year function at least equivalent to screws, with lower malreduction and fewer all-cause reoperations from avoiding routine implant removal. Functional differences are small and below the MCID, and certainty is low.
Level of Evidence:
Therapeutic,
Registration:
PROSPERO CRD420251166994.