DOI: 10.20935/acadeng7606 ISSN: 2994-7065
Sustainable method to extract potassium from K-feldspar using limestone flotation tailings
Sandeep Kumar Jena, Jogeshwara Sahu, Srikanta Bej, Baijayantimala Mohanty This study explores the potential use of limestone flotation tailings (LFT) for recovering potash values from K-feldspar (K2O, 11.4 wt.%). High-temperature leaching tests of potassium-enriched feldspar powder using various mineral acids reveal that a maximum of 18%–23% of potassium can be extracted under optimal conditions (specifically, with an acid concentration of 4M, at 90°C, for 60 min, using a particle size of <100 μm). In contrast, chlorination roasting employing LFT and NaCl as roasting additives, followed by water leaching, shows a significantly higher potassium recovery rate of 97%. The optimal conditions for this maximum recovery include a roasting temperature of 900°C, a roasting time of 40 min, and a K-feldspar to LFT and NaCl ratio of 1:0.5:0.75. The extraction value decreases to 50%–60% with only NaCl as an additive and drops to less than 10% when only LFT is used. This suggests that to effectively replace the K ions from the core of the crystal structure, all three ions (Na⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cl⁻) are necessary. The roasting temperature must exceed the melting point of the NaCl additive, which plays a crucial role in the extraction process. During roasting, the formation of water-soluble potassium phases (sylvite, KCl) and water-insoluble silicate phases (anorthite and nepheline) indicates the breakdown of the complex feldspar crystal structure. Various physicochemical characterizations of the samples were conducted to support the experimental results, using wet chemical analysis, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction techniques.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0264 2025
Specialism and generalism in social animals in variable environments Koichi Ito, Andrew Higginson
-
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0262 2025
The evolution of division of labour: preconditions and evolutionary feedback Michael Taborsky
-
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0206 2025
Group size and labour demands determine division of labour as a consequence of demographic stochasticity Christoph Netz, Tim W. Fawcett, Andrew D. Higginson, Michael Taborsky, Barbara Taborsky
-
DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2024-198 2025
Cardiovascular–obstetric state-of-the-art review: pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy Joy Yi Shan Ong, Jeannie Jing Yi Yap, Mahesh Choolani, Kian-Keong Poh, Pradip Dashraath, Ting-Ting Low
-
DOI: 10.1126/science.adt7570 2025
Hippocampal encoding of memories in human infants Tristan S. Yates, Jared Fel, Dawoon Choi, Juliana E. Trach, Lillian Behm, Cameron T. Ellis, Nicholas B. Turk-Browne
-
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0273 2025
Helping niches may trigger the development of task specialization and division of labour Barbara Taborsky
-
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0268 2025
Changes of division of labour along the eusociality spectrum in termites, with comparisons to multicellularity J. Korb
-
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0277 2025
Cultural evolution, social ratcheting and the evolution of human division of labour Lucio Vinicius, Leonardo Rizzo, Federico Battiston, Andrea Bamberg Migliano
-
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0275 2025
The evolution of cooperative breeding in family groups: when should parents tolerate unhelpful helpers? António M. M. Rodrigues, Christina Riehl
-
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0276 2025
Workload distribution in wild Damaraland mole-rat groups Shay Rotics, Hanna M. Bensch, Yehezkel S. Resheff, Tim Clutton-Brock, Markus Zöttl