DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000009625 ISSN:

Survival Rate of Dental Implants in the Cleft Area: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study

Caroline Chepernate Vieira dos Santos, Maiara Gabriela Gonçalves, Matheus Souza Campos Costa, Sandy Maria da Silva Costa, Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de Almeida
  • General Medicine
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

This study aimed to evaluate the survival rate of osseointegrated implants installed in the cleft area. An extensive data survey was conducted using the medical records of individuals who had implants installed in the cleft area between 1999 and 2020. The variables assessed were age, sex, implant follow-up time, implantation procedures, and rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses. Data were analyzed in terms of implant survival time, correlating with the factors: age, sex, execution, or no-execution of bone regrafting, the time interval between secondary alveolar bone grafting and regrafting, the time interval between regrafting and implant installation, and the time interval between implant installation and provisional and definitive prosthesis. Data were analyzed with respect to implant survival. χ2 and Student t tests were used with a 5% significance level. A total of 1295 medical records were analyzed, of which 688 reported implants in cleft areas (56.1% in females, 43.9% in males) with a success rate of 92.73% and a mean follow-up time of 53.2 (±45.0) months. There were no statistically significant differences in the correlation between the survival rate and sex (P = 0.895, χ2 test), between the implant survival rate and regrafted area (P = 0.904, χ2 test), or between the survival rate and patient age (P = 0.246, Student t test). The survival rate of implants in the cleft area was 92.73%. Age, sex, and the need for regrafting did not influence the survival rate of implants installed in the cleft area. Clinical studies that evaluate the survival rate of implants installed in patients with cleft maxilla are of great relevance to the dental field.

More from our Archive