DOI: 10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_192_26 ISSN: 2589-4528

Surgical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Failure of Phacoemulsification Combined with First and Second Generation Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents in Normal-Tension Glaucoma

Hiroki Tsutsui, Sakurako Shimokawa, Shotaro Shimokawa, Masatoshi Fukushima, Shunji Nakatake, Keijiro Ishikawa, Kohta Fujiwara, Koh-Hei Sonoda, Yusuke Murakami

Abstract

Purpose:

To report 1-year surgical outcomes of phaco-iStent and phaco-iStent inject W implantation in Japanese patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and to explore factors associated with surgical failure.

Methods:

This single-centre retrospective study included 51 eyes of 38 consecutive patients with NTG who underwent phaco-iStent (n = 18 eyes) or phaco-iStent inject W (n = 33 eyes) implantation, with approximately 1 year of follow-up. Main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of glaucoma medications, compared between the two groups. Surgical success was assessed using a modified composite definition. Statistical analyses accounted for the inclusion of both eyes from some patients.

Results:

Preoperative mean IOP and glaucoma medications were 13.8 ± 2.9 mmHg and 2.0 ± 1.1 in the phaco-iStent group; and 15.0 ± 3.4 mmHg and 2.8 ± 1.1 in the phaco-iStent inject W group. At 12 months, the adjusted between-group difference was 0.99 mmHg for IOP (95% CI, –0.62 to 2.60; p = 0.228) and –0.27 for glaucoma medications (95% CI, -0.96 to 0.41; p = 0.436). The 12-month cumulative surgical success rate was 43.8% in the phaco-iStent group and 54.5% in the phaco-iStent inject W group, with no statistically significant difference between groups ( p = 0.247). In exploratory univariable Cox analysis, greater central corneal thickness was associated with surgical failure (HR per 1-μm increase, 1.012; 95% CI, 1.002–1.022; p = 0.021), whereas preoperative IOP was not significantly associated with failure ( p = 0.069).

Conclusion:

Both phaco-iStent and phaco-iStent inject W reduced glaucoma medication use in Japanese patients with NTG, whereas the reduction in IOP was modest. No significant difference between the two procedures was found in the adjusted 12-month analyses.

More from our Archive