68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for cancer imaging: Results of a single-center, prospective, interventional, single-arm clinical trial.
Kim M. Pabst, Timo Bartel, Patrick Sandach, Christina Laschinsky, Manuel M. Weber, Lukas Kessler, Alina T. Küper, Boris A. Hadaschik, Claudia Kesch, Rainer Hamacher, Stefan Kasper, Lars E. Podleska, Jens T. Siveke, Markus Eckstein, Bastian von Tresckow, Sherko Kuemmel, Anke Reinacher-Schick, Waldemar Uhl, Ken Herrmann, Wofgang P. Fendler457
Background:
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is highly expressed on tumor-associated fibroblasts. FAP-directed radioligand positron emission tomography (
68
Ga-FAPI-46 PET) is a novel tool for cancer imaging. However, its diagnostic performance, especially in genitourinary (GU) cancers, is still unclear. Here, we aim to compare diagnostic performance of
68
Ga-FAPI-46 and
18
F-FDG PET, validated by histopathology.
Methods:
Patients (pts) at initial staging/restaging with (a) proven or suspected malignancy, (b) any tumor diameter > 1 cm, (c) planned or performed biopsy/surgery within 8 weeks prior to or after
68
Ga-FAPI-46 PET, and (d) no prior external beam radiation or systemic tumor therapy within 1 month underwent
68
Ga-FAPI-46 and clinical
18
F-FDG PET on subsequent days. For comparison, patient-based and region-based (local, nodal, distant organ or soft tissue, bone) image analysis was performed by three blinded nuclear medicine physicians, separate for each PET modality. Positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity (SE) were evaluated based on histopathologic results, and compared in the subgroups of GU cancers, sarcoma, and others. Inter-reader reproducibility was assessed using Fleiss‘ kappa.
Results:
A total of n=158 pts (median age: 62 years, male/female: n=101 (63.9%)/57 (36.1%)) were enrolled. 155 (98.1%)/152 (96.2%) pts underwent
68
Ga-FAPI-46/
18
F-FDG PET/CT. Histopathologic validation was available in n=145 (91.8%) pts. N=54 (34.2%)/28 (17.7%)/76 (48.1%) pts were diagnosed with GU cancers/sarcoma/others. Patient-based PPV/SE for
68
Ga-FAPI-46 (
18
F-FDG) PET were 94/72% (97/71%) for GU cancers, 100/96% (100/96%) for sarcoma, and 100/91% (100/88%) for others. Region-based PPV/SE for
68
Ga-FAPI-46 (
18
F-FDG) PET were 93/71% (97/70%) for GU cancers, 100/94% (97/90%) for sarcoma, and 99/90% (93/85%) for others. Patient-based inter-reader reproducibility for
68
Ga-FAPI-46 (
18
F-FDG) PET was 0.71 (0.43) for GU cancers, 1.0 (0.21) for sarcoma, and 0.6 (0.53) for others.
Conclusions:
68
Ga-FAPI-46 and
18
F-FDG PET demonstrate similar accuracy for tumor detection and localization of GU cancers. However, inter-reader reproducibility was superior for
68
Ga-FAPI-46 (substantial agreement) compared to
18
F-FDG PET (moderate agreement). Clinical trial information:
Patient characteristics.