Structural Performance and Boundary Effects of Dry-Jointed Sliding Masonry Infill Walls with Openings Under Sequential In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Loading

Conventional masonry infill walls can significantly alter the seismic response of framed buildings and often produce damage patterns incompatible with resilience-based seismic design. Dry-jointed sliding masonry wall systems have therefore emerged as deformation-tolerant alternatives that accommodate drift through controlled interface motion rather than damage accumulation. This study investigates the sequential in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) behavior of such systems considering wall thickness, openings, and boundary detailing. Six full-scale specimens were tested, including thick- and thin-wall reference specimens, thick-wall specimens with window openings, and thin-wall specimens with door openings. IP performance was evaluated using global hysteretic and energy-based response parameters, whereas OOP behavior was assessed through load–displacement response, an equivalent acceleration index, and selected image-based displacement fields. The results show that IP drift was mainly accommodated through distributed sliding along horizontal interfaces and local block rotation, without diagonal compression strut formation or brittle cracking, even at drift ratios up to approximately 3.5%. Wall thickness improved IP strength, stiffness, shear resistance, and cumulative energy dissipation, while openings mainly affected deformation compatibility and load-transfer continuity. Under OOP loading, wall thickness and boundary continuity increased stiffness and capacity while enabling resistance mobilization at smaller displacement levels. As inertia-based comparison indicators, boundary-enhanced thick- and thin-wall specimens reached equivalent acceleration capacities of 3.41 g and 1.64 g, respectively. Overall, the system reduced IP damage accumulation, but adequate OOP stability requires appropriate wall thickness, unit geometry, and boundary detailing.