Strength-Related Parameters and Assessment Methods in Female Track Cyclists: A Systematic Review
Esteban Aedo-Muñoz, Bastián Salazar-Adasme, Santiago García de Miguel, Daniel Pecos-Martin, David Arriagada-Tarifeño, Jorge Cancino-Jimenez, Ciro Brito, Jorge Pérez-Contreras, Bárbara Arancibia-Iturbe, Freddy Paniagua-MolinaBackground/Objectives: Performance in track cycling depends on efficiently generating and applying force, with kinetic variables like force, torque, and power being critical. Although force-related qualities are more trainable for sprint power, research in track cycling is limited, especially in women, restricting equity and application. This study aimed to describe strength-related parameters and assessment methods in female track cyclists. Methods: A systematized review following PRISMA 2020 was conducted. Databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Dialnet, Scielo) were searched from 1 January 2016, to 16 April 2025. Inclusion criteria: primary studies on female track cyclists assessing kinetic strength variables. Exclusions: studies with Paralympic-classified disabilities or without sex-specific results. Data on power, force, torque, protocols, and participants were extracted; quality was assessed using the Downs and Black scale. Registered in INPLASY (INPLASY202550092). Results: From 6391 records, 3514 duplicates were removed, and 2877 were analyzed to eligibility criteria; 4 studies (n = 32 athletes) were included. All reported power; three reported torque (n = 25), one reported force (n = 6), and one reported rate of force development (n = 6). Assessments used cycle ergometers (n = 3), a bicycle with a potentiometer (n = 1), and a force platform (n = 1). Conclusions: Power and torque are the most studied kinetic variables in female track cycling. Evidence shows substantial methodological heterogeneity and a scarcity of studies in women, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and increased research in this population.