STREAM: A data-driven framework for physiological state monitoring in ICU patients

Intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring systems face a critical gap: translating continuous physiological data into interpretable patterns that support clinical assessment. Existing approaches rely on static thresholds or severity scores that fail to capture dynamic disease progression patterns and provide limited insight into why patients change over time. We developed STREAM (State Trajectory Representation and Evolution-Aware Monitoring), which models each patient as a point in a multidimensional physiological space and applies geometric analysis of routine ICU data to track physiological instability. STREAM analyzes 26 routinely collected clinical measurements using optimal transport theory to discover data-derived physiological states without predefined categories and maps each patient to their nearest state. We evaluated STREAM using the multicenter eICU Collaborative Research Database (N = 158,294) for development and MIMIC-IV (N = 84,517) for external validation. STREAM identified five reproducible data-derived physiological states with distinct clinical signatures. Patients who spent less than 10% of their ICU stay within their expected state (state outliers) had ICU mortality of 37.6%, 16-fold higher than those who remained within their assigned states (2.3%). Mortality prediction achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.863 at 8 hours and 0.903 at 72 hours, with excellent calibration (expected calibration error of 0.002). External validation on MIMIC-IV maintained robust performance (0.798 and 0.857, respectively), with state outliers exhibiting 10-fold higher mortality (33.5% vs. 3.2%). Feature importance analysis identified which laboratory values and vital signs are associated with movement toward higher-risk states, providing interpretable clinical explanations. STREAM provides transparent monitoring across data-derived physiological states, linking state dynamics with outcome prediction. Strong discrimination, calibration, and reproducibility across multicenter datasets support the method’s potential for prospective evaluation.