DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehag785.754 ISSN: 0195-668X

Stepwise cardioneuroablation for refractory vasovagal syncope: efficiency and clinical outcomes of a right-sided first strategy

S Guillot, R Robledo, J C Solis, E N Andrade, M A Monroy, J Molina, J J I Y Zamora, R A Bonilla, F D Martinez

Abstract

Background

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is an emerging treatment for refractory vasovagal syncope (VVS). While biatrial approaches are common, the efficacy of a stepwise strategy—beginning with right-sided ablation and progressing to the left atrium only if necessary—remains incompletely defined.

Methods

We conducted an observational, retrospective registry (2024–2025) of 57 patients (mean age 34.5 ± 16.8 years) with highly refractory cardioinhibitory (VASIS 2A/2B, 77.2%) or mixed (VASIS 1, 22.8%) VVS. All patients had normal intrinsic conduction verified by electrophysiological study and a positive atropine challenge. A fragmented electrogram-guided stepwise CNA was performed. Left-sided ablation was performed exclusively if right-sided ablation failed to meet predefined endpoints (fragmented electrogram elimination, heart rate [HR] increase >25%, and post-ablation atropine response <10%).

Results

Acute procedural success was achieved in 96.5% of cases. Right-sided ablation alone met denervation criteria in 30 patients (52.6%), while 27 (47.4%) required a subsequent biatrial approach. The requirement for a biatrial approach was not significantly predicted by the predominant rhythm disturbance (sinus slowing vs. AV block). At a mean follow-up of 12.5 ± 6.0 months, there were 0% syncope recurrences. Significant improvements were observed at 6 months in mean HR (59.7 ± 9.9 to 79.6 ± 7.8 bpm; P < 0.001) and in all time- and frequency-domain heart rate variability parameters, confirming sustained parasympathetic withdrawal.

Conclusions

A stepwise, electrogram-guided CNA is a highly safe and effective therapy for carefully selected patients with functional VVS. Initial right-sided ablation is sufficient in over half of the cases, safely optimizing procedure time and avoiding unnecessary left atrial access without compromising clinical outcomes.

More from our Archive