Spatial and Elevational Patterns of Golden Snub-Nosed Monkeys and Tibetan macaques in Lushan County, Ya’an, Sichuan, China
Ruifeng Zhu, Haipeng Zheng, Xuelian Zhang, Zhiyi Zhao, Yueming Zheng, Fan Leni, Feng Zhou, Cheng Qi, Wenfeng Ma, Congjun Zheng, Jincheng Shi, Weimiao Zhuang, Ke HeSympatric species may share a landscape while differing in their environmental associations and daily activity. We examined these dimensions in golden snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) and Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana) using 110 field-informed analytical units derived from 118 physical camera stations in Lushan County, Sichuan Province, China. Across 35,529 effective camera-days and an analytical-unit elevational range of 1395–2771 m, we recorded 20 independent unit-level camera-detection events of golden snub-nosed monkeys at 12 units and 1681 events of Tibetan macaques at 94 units. Ten golden snub-nosed monkey-positive units also recorded Tibetan macaques, but overall unit-level similarity was low because Tibetan macaque detections were more widespread. After adjustment for camera-days, golden snub-nosed monkey unit-level detection was positively associated with elevation (OR = 2.007, 95% CI = 1.051–3.833), whereas Tibetan macaques showed a negative estimated association with an interval including one (OR = 0.516, 95% CI = 0.256–1.041). Both species were predominantly diurnal and showed substantial diel activity overlap (Δ1 = 0.908, 95% CI = 0.696–0.923). Frequent unit-level co-use and substantial diel overlap therefore coexisted with contrasting estimated elevational associations, indicating that shared detections in one ecological dimension need not imply similar patterns in another.