DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znag087.086 ISSN: 0007-1323

SP 6.13 Management and Outcomes of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Retrospective 5 year Study from a Tertiary Care NHS Trust

Nida Khan, Rafique Umer Harvitkar, Lorcan Moore, Premjithlal Bhaskaran, Heena Patel, Christi Swaminathan

Abstract

Introduction

Sigmoid volvulus (SV) is a potentially life-threatening cause of large bowel obstruction that requires prompt diagnosis and intervention to reduce the morbidity and mortality rates. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with SV at a tertiary care center.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who presented with SV between October 2020 and September 2025. Demographic data, comorbidities, imaging, endoscopic decompression, surgical intervention, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and 30- and 100-day mortality were also recorded.

Discussion

Forty-six patients were identified (29 men and 17 women; mean age, 77.67 years). All patients underwent initial imaging with abdominal radiography or CT, followed by flexible sigmoidoscopy for decompression. 18 patients underwent surgical management, whereas 28 were managed conservatively. The operative group had longer mean hospital stay (29.18 ± 26.02 days SD) than the non-operative group (12.66 ± 16.52 days SD). Postoperative complications occurred in 28% of the surgically treated patients. No 30-day deaths occurred in the operative group, although two 100-day deaths were recorded in the same group. In comparison, the nonoperative group had nine 30-day deaths and five 100-day deaths, largely among patients with high ASA scores, comorbidities, frailty, and neurological impairment.

Conclusion

SV predominantly affected elderly patients with comorbidities in this cohort. Although surgery was associated with longer hospitalization, it demonstrated lower short-term mortality than conservative management. Early clinical stratification and timely definitive intervention may improve outcomes, but must be balanced against the risks associated with operating on frail geriatric patients.

More from our Archive