Soil tests of biological activity as predictors of rice response to nitrogen
Aziz Ahmed, Jim J. Wang, Manoch Kongchum, Lewis Gaston, Dustin L. Harrell, Nutifafa Adotey, Md. Ali Haider, Baoyue ZhouAbstract
Carbon and N indicators of soil health are related to soil N dynamics. Previous research has examined these relationships as bases for N fertilizer recommendations with several crops, though not with flooded rice ( Oryza sativa L.). This study determined relationships between two soil tests of biological activity (STBA) (CO 2 ‐burst and alkali‐hydrolyzable nitrogen [AHN]) and yields of delayed flood rice in Louisiana. The data were from 21 N trials across five sites (silt loam to clay soils). Yield without N ( Y 0 ), Y 0 relative to maximum yield ( Y 0 / Y M ), and maximum yield increase (Δ Y M = Y M − Y 0 ) were significantly correlated with both STBAs in medium‐texture soils. Correlations were weaker in heavy‐texture soils ( Y 0 / Y M and Δ Y M with CO 2 ‐burst, and Y 0 / Y M with AHN). However, rates of N needed to achieve modeled 95% Y M were not significantly related to either STBA for either textural group. Calibration failed because slopes of the response curves varied substantially among trials. Alternatively, net yield increase (Δ Y = Y − Y 0 ) was well described by models using CO 2 ‐burst to predict Δ Y M ( R 2 = 0.85 and 071, medium and heavy soils), with small mean absolute error (∼6% and 9% of average Δ Y M , medium and heavy soils). The Δ Y approach describes a decreasing yield increase with N rate that further decreases with CO 2 ‐burst value. Thus, N rate might be based on modeled Δ Y M rather than a critical soil test value. Further research is needed on this approach and to explain the variability in response to N.