DOI: 10.3390/agriculture16131366 ISSN: 2077-0472

Small Target Detection in Agricultural Visual Perception: Progress and Challenges

Hui Li, Han Cheng, Qi Niu, Chengsong Li, Lihong Wang, Xiongkui He, Yuheng Yang, Pei Wang

Reliable detection of small agricultural targets is fundamental to precision crop protection, phenotyping, yield estimation, and robotic intervention. Typical examples include detecting aphids such as Aphis gossypii, whiteflies such as Bemisia tabaci, planthoppers such as Nilaparvata lugens, and other tiny pests on sticky traps or crop canopies for early warning, identifying crop-like weed seedlings for site-specific herbicide spraying, locating early disease lesions for targeted treatment, and detecting young fruits, flowers, or wheat heads for yield estimation and robotic manipulation. Agricultural small-object detection differs from generic small-object detection because target visibility is jointly determined by pixel area, physical size, imaging distance, ground sampling distance, canopy structure, biological similarity, and task-specific intervention requirements. Existing reviews have summarized agricultural object detection or general small-object detection, but they rarely connect agricultural failure modes with detector-level mechanisms and reproducible evaluation practices. This review addresses this gap through a mechanism-oriented synthesis of agricultural small-object detection. First, we revisit the limitations of the COCO-style 322-pixel threshold and propose an agricultural scale-reporting framework that combines pixel area, physical scale, relative image occupancy, and acquisition geometry. Second, we organize recent methods according to the mechanisms by which they address detail loss, scale shift, occlusion, dense distributions, foreground–background confusion, localization uncertainty, and edge-deployment constraints. Third, we summarize public datasets, quantitative evaluation metrics, reporting checklists, and real-device deployment evidence to support fair and field-oriented comparison. Finally, we identify future directions in multimodal sensing, foundation-model adaptation, label-efficient learning, and hardware-aware optimization. By linking agricultural scene characteristics, detector mechanisms, and evaluation requirements, this review aims to provide a more actionable framework for developing robust small-object detection systems in precision agriculture.

More from our Archive