Single center experience and literature review of kidney transplantation from non‐ideal donors with acute kidney injury: Risk and reward
Christopher J. Webb, Emily McCracken, Colleen L. Jay, Berjesh Sharda, Matthew Garner, Alan C. Farney, Giuseppe Orlando, Amber Reeves‐Daniel, Alejandra Mena‐Gutierrez, Natalia Sakhovskaya, Bobby Stratta, Robert J. Stratta- Transplantation
Abstract
Introduction
There is limited experience transplanting kidneys from either expanded criteria donors (ECD) or donation after circulatory death (DCD) deceased donors with terminal acute kidney injury (AKI).
Methods
AKI kidneys were defined by a donor terminal serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL whereas non‐ideal deceased donor (NIDD) kidneys were defined as AKI/DCD or AKI/ECDs.
Results
From February 2007 to March 2023, we transplanted 266 single AKI donor kidneys including 29 from ECDs, 29 from DCDs (n = 58 NIDDs), and 208 from brain‐dead standard criteria donors (SCDs). Mean donor age (43.7 NIDD vs. 33.5 years SCD), KDPI (66% NIDD vs. 45% SCD), and recipient age (57 NIDD vs. 51 years SCD) were higher in the NIDD group (all p < .01). Mean waiting times (17.8 NIDD vs. 24.2 months SCD) and dialysis duration (34 NIDD vs. 47 months SCD) were shorter in the NIDD group (p < .05). Delayed graft function (DGF, 48%) and 1‐year graft survival (92.7% NIDD vs. 95.9% SCD) was similar in both groups. Five‐year patient and kidney graft survival rates were 82.1% versus 89.9% and 82.1% versus 75.2% (both p = NS) in the NIDD versus SCD groups, respectively.
Conclusions
The use of kidneys from AKI donors can be safely liberalized to include selected ECD and DCD donors.