DOI: 10.3390/cimb48111105 ISSN: 1467-3045

Single-Cell and Spatial Omics of the Oral Cancer Ecosystem: A Scoping Review and Translational Evidence Map from Malignant Transformation to Immunotherapy Response

Alessandro Polizzi, Federica Di Gregorio, Angela Angjelova, Elena Jovanova, Salvatore Torrisi, Roberto Campagna, Saturnino Marco Lupi, Gaetano Isola

Background/Objectives: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) exhibit marked cellular and spatial heterogeneity that is incompletely captured by bulk molecular profiling. This scoping review mapped single-cell and spatial omics applications across oral carcinogenesis and assessed the translational maturity of reported biomarkers and signatures. Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in August 2026. Human studies of OPMDs and OSCC using eligible single-cell or spatial omics were selected according to a predefined PCC framework and synthesized following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Biomarkers were classified using a prespecified, review-specific exploratory T0–T4 Translational Maturity Matrix. Results: Of 1405 records identified, 735 duplicates were removed, 670 records screened, and 64 full texts assessed; 55 studies were included. Single-cell RNA sequencing was used in 49/55 studies (89.1%), while 20/55 (36.4%) incorporated spatial omics. Recurrent themes included epithelial plasticity, fibroblast and immune remodeling, spatially organized metabolic and stromal niches, nodal dissemination, and treatment-associated immune reconfiguration. One study was T0, four T1, 27 T2, and 23 T3. T3 reflected validation in an independent patient cohort or external dataset linked to a clinical endpoint, rather than validation of a clinically qualified assay. No study reached T4. Conclusions: Single-cell and spatial omics have refined the oral cancer ecosystem, but clinical translation remains limited by platform heterogeneity, overlapping datasets, and insufficient prospective validation; the maturity framework should therefore be interpreted as an exploratory evidence-mapping tool rather than a validated measure of clinical readiness. Standardized longitudinal studies and clinically deployable assays are needed to advance precision oral oncology.

More from our Archive