DOI: 10.1061/jsdccc.sceng-2273 ISSN: 2996-5136
Simplified Design Charts for Effective Modulus of Elasticity in Reinforced Concrete Beams
A. Mamatha, Sumant K. Kulkarni Abstract
Structural analysis and design of a reinforced concrete (RC) beam satisfying a reliable serviceability criterion demand precise calculation of the effective modulus of elasticity (
E
RCC
) of a beam. Various international codes suggest an empirical equation for the modulus of elasticity of concrete (
E
c
) dependent on the compressive strength of concrete (
f
c
k
) alone. However, real-life buildings are of RC material and not concrete only. The current study was undertaken to represent a simplified method to evaluate
E
RCC
for doubly RC beams by developing empirical correction factors and design charts resulting entirely from experimental data. Six beams of a cross-section
250
mm
×
500
mm
×
2,100
mm
for M35 concrete grade were tested, subjected to two-point loading. The reinforcement for a beam specimen was varied in the range of 0.193% to 0.535%. The regression analysis was carried out to express a compact equation of
E
RCC
dependent on
f
c
k
, tension reinforcement (
p
t
), and compression reinforcement (
p
c
). A dimensionless correction factor (
k
=
E
RCC
/
E
c
) and a design chart for the M35 grade of concrete were calculated and plotted. The correction factor was found to be between 1.05 and 1.30 for beams with a reinforcement ratio (
ρ
=
p
t
/
p
c
) in the range of 0.2 to 0.55. The modified approach resulted in 15%–25% reduction in deflections due to serviceability loads that the conventional code estimates. Results indicate that stiffness correction increases systematically with reinforcement percentage, leading to improved prediction of beam deflection and serviceability response. The deflection reduction was recorded strictly adhering to reinforcement ratios, beam dimensions, and loading levels undertaken in the study. The charts are therefore recommended for use within the calibrated parameter domain and should not be extrapolated beyond the validated limits.