Short-Term Outcome Comparison of Arthroscopic Chondroplasty and Microfracture for Treatment of Small and Medium-Sized Osteochondral Defects of the Ankle
Matthew Yuro, Jorge Acevedo, Thomas Harris, Dominic S. CarreiraAbstract
Background:
To compare short-term outcomes of patients diagnosed with small and medium-sized osteochondral ankle defects who were treated with chondroplasty and microfracture.
Materials and Methods:
A retrospective multicentre ankle and foot arthroscopy registry was queried for patients from December 2017 to December 2022 who were diagnosed with a small or medium-sized osteochondral ankle defect and treated with an arthroscopic chondroplasty or microfracture. Demographic and intraoperative variables were collected. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports Subscale (FAAM-S), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), VR-12 Mental, VR-12 Physical and Foot Function Index (FFI) PROMs were completed by patients preoperatively and at a minimum of one year postoperatively. Data were compared between patients who were treated with chondroplasty and those treated with microfracture. The differences in continuous variables were assessed via paired-sample
Results:
Thirteen patients were treated with chondroplasty, and 22 patients were treated with microfracture. There were no demographic differences between groups (
Conclusion:
There were no significant outcome differences in patients treated with chondroplasty and microfracture for small to medium-sized chondral ankle defects. Patients in both groups saw significant improvements in PROMs at a minimum of one year postoperatively. In small and medium-sized chondral lesions, microfracture may be recommended over chondroplasty for lesions with greater depth or ICRS grade.