DOI: 10.1161/jaha.125.046951 ISSN: 2047-9980
Sex‐Specific Gaps in Cardiovascular Psychosocial Research: An Analysis of Studies Cited in the American Heart Association's 2021 Statement on Psychological Health and Cardiovascular Disease
Astha Burande, Aksha Burande, Nicole L. Tegg, Colleen M. Norris
Background
The American Heart Association's 2021 Scientific Statement on Psychological Health, Well‐Being, and the Mind–Heart–Body Connection affirms the critical role contributed by psychosocial factors in cardiovascular disease outcomes, yet the cited resource continues to lack the sex‐specific rigor necessary for equitable clinical guidance.
Methods
We conducted a review of 206 research articles cited in the statement to assess whether studies reported participant sex, reported the percentage of women enrolled, tested for sex differences, and performed sex‐disaggregated analyses.
Results
Although 71% of studies disclosed participant sex, only 29% examined results by sex, drew sex‐inclusive conclusions (27%), or performed appropriate subgroup analyses (25%). These practices varied significantly by study design: randomized controlled trials, the gold standard of clinical evidence and most relied upon for clinical practice guidelines, had the lowest rates of female‐majority (≥50%) enrollment, while cohort and cross‐sectional designs were more inclusive. In pooled meta‐analytic data comprising 899 studies, male‐only trials exceeded female‐only ones, and 16% failed to report sex. Temporal trends revealed no meaningful improvement in sex reporting from 1987 to 2021, despite decades of policy reforms intended to close these gaps. While slight gains in female enrollment and analytic rigor were observed, they remain insufficient to meet the needs of sex‐responsive research.
Conclusions
Our findings reveal a critical disconnect between the clinical importance of psychosocial factors and the sex representation in the evidence used to guide practice. Deliberate reforms in study design and analytic expectations are needed to ensure that future guidelines rest on an equitable foundation.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca02008 2026
Proximal Smoothness and the Lower-C
2
Property F. H. Clarke, R. J. Stern, P. R. Wolenski
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca13044 2026
Characterizations of Prox-Regular Sets in Uniformly Convex Banach Spaces Frédéric Bernard, Lionel Thibault, Nadia Zlateva
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca15047 2026
Brøndsted-Rockafellar Property and Maximality of Monotone Operators Representable by Convex Functions in Non-Reflexive Banach Spaces Maicon Marques Alves, Benar Fux Svaiter
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca16027 2026
Proximal Smoothness and the Exterior Sphere Condition Chadi Nour, Ron J. Stern, Jean Takche
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca16053 2026
A New Old Class of Maximal Monotone Operators Maicon Marques Alves, Benar Fux Svaiter
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca13045 2026
Maximal Monotonicity via Convex Analysis Jonathan Borwein
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca08009 2026
Variational Inequalities and Regularity Properties of Closed Sets in Hilbert Spaces Giovanni Colombo, Vladimir V. Goncharov
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca17060 2026
Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for Non-Autonomous Complementarity Dynamical Systems Bernard Brogliato, Lionel Thibault
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca01001 2026
Variational Sum of Monotone Operators H. Attouch, J.-B. Baillon, M. Théra
-
DOI: 10.68381/jca22017 2026
Weak Convexity of Sets and Functions in a Banach Space Grigorii E. Ivanov