Sex Differences in Pacing Profile and Reliability in a 4-km Cycling Time Trial
Alisson Henrique Marinho, Julio Cezar Schamne, Julio Satoshi Hasegawa, Victor Henrique Vieira Cavalcante, Felippi Gonçalves, Rômulo Bertuzzi, Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva, Gislaine Cristina-SouzaBackground:
Sex differences in pacing profile and day-to-day variability have been underexplored. Therefore, this study investigated potential sex differences in pacing profile, risk-taking behavior, and pacing reliability during a 4-km cycling time trial.
Hypothesis:
Men and women present similar pacing and assume similar risk of premature trial interruption during a 4-km cycling time trial. In addition, it was hypothesized that men and women might present comparable performance and pacing reliability.
Study Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Level of Evidence:
Level 4.
Methods:
A total of 32 cyclists (16 men and 16 women) performed 2 4-km cycling time trials on separate days. Power output and ratings of perceived exertion were recorded during the trials. To quantify the risk of premature time-trial interruption, the hazard score was calculated as the product of the rating of perceived exertion and the remaining distance.
Results:
There were no sex differences in power output distribution or hazard score during the 4-km cycling time trial (
Conclusion:
Men and women exhibit similar pacing profiles, risk-taking behavior, and endurance performance reliability during a 4-km cycling time trial. However, women seem to demonstrate greater day-to-day pacing profile variability than men.
Clinical Relevance:
The present findings provide insights that enable more accurate monitoring and prescription of training protocols in female cyclists.