DOI: 10.16986/hunefd.1808862 ISSN: 2536-4758
School Administrators’ Perceptions of Educational Leadership: Strengths and Areas for Development
Şevval Karsavuranoğlu, Eda Gürlen This study aims to examine the perceptions of school administrators working at preschool, primary, secondary and high school levels about educational administration, their strengths and aspects that need to be developed. In the study, in which phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research designs, was used, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 school administrators determined by maximum diversity sampling, and the data obtained were evaluated by content analysis. As a result of the research, it was determined that the participants defined the concept of educational administrator in three main themes: “educational leader”, “a professional occupation” and “a person responsible for school functioning”. The most frequently emphasized characteristics in the context of educational leadership are effective communication, fairness and willingness to change. While some participants identified educational administrators as the implementers of policies, others stated that they could not fully assume the role of educational administrators due to their limited authority. While the participants had difficulty in identifying the strengths of educational administrators in Turkiye, weaknesses such as lack of qualifications, lack of communication and being resistant to change were highlighted. While participants expressed their strengths more easily, they expressed their weaknesses in a limited way. The findings reveal that educational administration should be defined as a professional occupation, merit-based selection processes should be strengthened, and comprehensive in-service training programs should be made compulsory for administrator candidates.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1145/3845995 2026
A Survey of LLM-based Software Repair: Taxonomies, Design Paradigms, and Applications Boyang Yang, Zijian Cai, Fengling Liu, Bach Le, Lingming Zhang, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Yang Liu, Haoye Tian
-
DOI: 10.1108/jrim-02-2024-0074 2026
Cutting-edge research in social media and interactive marketing: a
review and research agenda James W Peltier, Andrew J Dahl, Lauren Drury, Tracy Khan
-
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-04-2021-0336 2026
Knowledge hiding – a systematic review and research
agenda Amitabh Anand, Florian Offergelt, Payal Anand
-
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20230448 2026
The Unequal Economic Consequences of Carbon Pricing Diego R. Känzig
-
DOI: 10.1017/awf.2026.10115 2026
Part 1: Assessment of upright restraint of broilers for head-only electrical stunning Troy J. Gibson, Georgina Limon, Shannon Campbell, Natalie Chancellor, Katharine A Fletcher, Paul Berry, Jeff Lines
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86 2026
MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.86-r2.0 2026
Codebase release 2.0 for MadAgents Tilman Plehn, Daniel Schiller, Nikita Schmal
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85 2026
svPITE: A Python package for the state-vector-based probabilistic imaginary-time evolution algorithm Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.85-r1.1 2026
Codebase release 1.1 for svPITE Pascal Sievers, Satoshi Ejima
-
DOI: 10.1177/02611929261494117 2026
The World Medical Association’s
Declaration of Helsinki
and
Statement on Animal Use in Biomedical Research
: Why reliable and valid preclinical evidence and Natalie Anderson, Jane Kotzmann, Rachel Smith, Kathrin Herrmann