Safety of 3-month rifampicin-isoniazid TPT in child household contacts in a community-based intervention
B. Tchakounte Youngui, B.K. Tchounga, D. Atwine, A. Vasiliu, B. Cuer, L. Simo, R. Okello, P. Tchendjou, A. Kuate Kuate, S. Turyahabwe, J. Cohn, S.M. Graham, M. Casenghi, M. Bonnet,<sec><title>BACKGROUND</title>The WHO recommends shorter TB preventive treatment (TPT) regimens and decentralised delivery models to improve effectiveness. This study evaluated the safety of a 3-month rifampicin-isoniazid (3RH) regimen administered by community health workers (CHWs) in households in Cameroon and Uganda.</sec><sec><title>METHODS</title>A cluster-randomised trial was conducted among child contacts of TB patients. We compared the safety of 3RH delivered by CHWs at home (intervention) vs standard-of-care, facility-based administration of 3RH. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and adverse reactions (ARs). We described the steps from symptom identification by CHWs to classification by a clinician.</sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title>Of 1,316 children initiated on 3RH, AEs were reported in 8.7% (81/936) in the intervention arm versus 11.3% (43/380) in the standard-of-care arm, P = 0.15. Overall, 37 SAEs occurred in 36 children, all non-medication related. There were 16 ARs reported, occurring in 1.0% (9/936) of children in the intervention arm and 1.6% (6/380) in the standard-of-care arm, P = 0.22. During 4,608 follow-up visits, 21 children reporting AR symptoms were identified by CHWs, 16 were assessed by clinicians, and 4 ARs were confirmed.</sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS</title>The 3RH regimen was safe, including when administered by trained CHWs in community settings, supporting its use in decentralised healthcare models.</sec>