Routine MRI Signal Intensity as a Surrogate of Subchondral Bone Healing: Validation Against Micro-CT and Histology in an Ovine Model
Felix R. M. Koenig, Veronika Janacova, Markus Schreiner, Marlene Stuempflen, Vladimir Juras, Pavol Szomolanyi, Raoul Varga, Gregor Wollner, Janina M. Patsch, Giuseppe Filardo, Ali Guermazi, Siegfried TrattnigBackground/Objectives: To test whether routine T1-weighted spin-echo (T1-SE) and proton-density fast spin-echo (PD-FSE) MRI signal intensity (SI) can index bone regeneration after osteochondral scaffold implantation by correlating MRI metrics with micro-CT and histology. Methods: Twenty-eight sheep with bilateral trochlear defects were evaluated in separate cohorts at 30, 180, and 365 days (n = 7, 11, and 10, respectively). One knee received a tri-layered resorbable scaffold; the contralateral defect was left empty. MRI (T1-SE, PD-FSE) was read by two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists using 10-point Likert scales (T1: apparent mineralization; PD: SI normalization). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between repair-bone and reference bone was computed. MRI measures were correlated with micro-CT (new bone volume; trabecular bone volume) and histology (ICRS subchondral bone reconstruction; new bone; filling). Results: Likert ratings on both T1-SE and PD-FSE correlated with micro-CT new bone volume and trabecular bone volume and with histological measures of repair. PD-FSE CNR was inversely associated with micro-CT new bone volume and trabecular bone volume (both p < 0.001), indicating lower CNR with greater bone regeneration, whereas T1-SE CNR showed no significant associations. Inter-reader agreement was excellent (ICC 0.947 individual; 0.973 average), with good-to-excellent intra-reader reliability (0.920–0.963). Conclusions: Reader-based Likert assessment on both sequences and PD-FSE CNR provide complementary, non-invasive markers of subchondral bone regeneration, supporting MRI for radiation-free follow-up and endpoint selection in future translational studies. T1-SE CNR did not track incremental mineralization and should not be used as a stand-alone quantitative marker in early healing.