Risk-Aware Trading Signals for Smart Aggregators in Multi-Time-Scale Electricity Markets Using Regime-Switching and Tail-Risk Analysis
Shuaikang Wang, Haijing Zhang, Dunnan Liu, Suoyue Wang, Hui HuangWith the rapid expansion of renewable energy and the formal operation of provincial electricity spot markets in China, smart aggregators that coordinate flexible loads, storage resources, demand-response portfolios, and distributed energy resources increasingly face imbalance-settlement risk across the day-ahead and real-time segments of the electricity spot market. Existing studies often focus on average prices or point forecasts, which may overlook regime persistence, negative-price clustering, and tail exposure in high-frequency price spreads. This paper develops a regime-switching and tail-risk signal framework to characterize and forecast day-ahead–real-time price spreads in the Shandong electricity spot market and to translate these forecasts into risk-aware trading signals for representative smart aggregators. Using 35,136 non-public observations at 15 min resolution provided by State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company for 2024, the spread is analyzed using descriptive statistics, Markov regime-switching models, quantile regression, out-of-sample forecasting, trading-signal backtesting, component ablation, and robustness checks. The spread, defined as real-time price minus day-ahead price, has a mean of −7.50 Chinese yuan per megawatt-hour (CNY/MWh), a median of −0.005 CNY/MWh, 5% and 95% quantiles of −196.84 and 137.65 CNY/MWh, and 1% and 99% quantiles of −372.68 and 338.04 CNY/MWh, respectively. A three-state Markov model identifies negative-deviation high-volatility, near-zero low-volatility, and positive-deviation regimes with multi-hour persistence. In the December out-of-sample test, the upper- and lower-tail quantile signals achieve recall rates of 0.872 and 0.841, respectively, and removing lagged spreads increases mean absolute error (MAE) from 24.015 to 54.278 CNY/MWh. The framework provides risk-warning signals rather than causal identification or realized-profit evaluation.