Retinal atrophy in multiple sclerosis is similar with extended versus standard interval natalizumab therapy
Brenna McCormack, Omar Ezzedin, Ting-Yi Lin, Anna Bacchetti, Giulia S. Moretti, Ernest Lievers, Ananya Gulati, Simidele Davis, Gabriel Otero-Duran, Devon J. Bonair, Nicole Pellegrini, Georgios Gakis, Angeliki Filippatou, Clare McGarvey Lambert, Martin Maurice O’Donnell, Kathryn Fitzgerald, Elias S. Sotirchos, Peter A. Calabresi, Scott D. Newsome, Ellen M. Mowry, Shiv SaidhaBackground
Retinal ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) atrophy reflects global neurodegeneration and disability in multiple sclerosis. Extended interval dosing (EID; every 5–8 weeks) natalizumab reduces progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk in people with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (PwRRMS) versus standard interval dosing (SID; every 4 weeks).
Objectives
To assess if EID versus SID natalizumab differentially impacts GCIPL atrophy, other retinal layer (peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), inner nuclear layer (INL), and outer nuclear layer (ONL)) atrophy, and/or clinical outcomes in PwRRMS.
Methods
PwRRMS underwent longitudinal Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (OCT), expanded disability status scale (EDSS), 100% and 2.5% contrast letter-acuity (LA) assessments. Analyses utilized mixed-effects regression models adjusting for age, sex, race, disease duration, optic neuritis history, and interval between treatment initiation and OCT monitoring, accounting for within-subject, inter-eye correlations.
Results
GCIPL and pRNFL atrophy rates were not significantly different between EID (
Conclusion
We detected no significant difference in GCIPL or pRNFL atrophy, or clinical outcomes, between EID and SID natalizumab. Faster INL and ONL atrophy may relate to cohort demographic differences.