Resin Cementation Protocols for Indirect Partial Coverage Ceramic Restorations: A Narrative Review
Shaima M. Shafiq, Paras Mull Gehlot, Ashwini Tumkur ShivkumarAbstract
Objective:
This study aims to summarize the various cementation protocols for partial coverage ceramic restorations using various resin cements available in the current market, emphasizing their indication, bonding mechanisms, and clinical outcomes.
Methods:
A narrative literature review was conducted using medical subject headings-based search strategies and free-text keywords across databases, including PubMed and Scopus. The search focused on studies evaluating resin cements used for bonding partial coverage tooth-colored restorations (PCRs). Inclusion criteria comprised
Results:
The included studies categorized resin cements into three main groups: total-etch, self-etch, and self-adhesive systems, each demonstrating distinct bonding mechanisms and clinical protocols. The effectiveness of each cement type was influenced by factors such as restorative material (e.g., glass ceramics vs. zirconia), surface treatment, and tooth substrate characteristics.
Conclusion:
The success of PCRs mostly relies on proper cementation protocols and selection of resin cements that are further influenced by the choice of restorative material and the substrate. Mastering the adhesive protocols is crucial for obtaining optimal retention, esthetics, and longevity of restorations.