DOI: 10.3390/medsci14070714 ISSN: 2076-3271

Residual Inflammatory Risk in Contemporary Coronary Intervention: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Opportunities

Panagiotis Iliakis, Athanasios Sakalidis, Nikolaos Ktenopoulos, Anastasios Apostolos, Paschalis Karakasis, Mohamed Amer Nashtar, Panagiotis Theofilis, Panagiotis Tsioufis, Obayda Azizy, Vasileios Panoulas, Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Polykarpos Christos Patsalis, Konstantinos Tsioufis

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) effectively treats flow-limiting coronary lesions but does not eliminate the systemic processes that drive atherosclerotic progression and recurrent events. Residual inflammatory risk (RIR), most commonly identified by persistent elevation of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), has emerged as an important component of this remaining risk and frequently persists despite intensive lipid lowering. Its interpretation after PCI, however, requires attention to timing, since inflammation related to acute myocardial injury and procedural vascular damage must be distinguished from persistent inflammatory activity after clinical stabilisation. In this review, we examine the biological basis of RIR and its relationship with plaque vulnerability, vascular healing, and recurrent events after coronary intervention. We discuss the role of hsCRP and other circulating biomarkers in post-PCI phenotyping, together with cardiometabolic conditions—including obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atherogenic dyslipidaemia, and hyperuricaemia—that may sustain inflammatory activation despite successful revascularisation. We also critically appraise the therapeutic evidence. Although CANTOS established inflammation as a modifiable component of atherothrombotic risk and colchicine has shown benefit in selected coronary populations, neutral findings with hyperacute colchicine initiation and, more recently, IL-6 inhibition emphasise that biomarker reduction does not necessarily translate into fewer cardiovascular events. Current guidelines recognise anti-inflammatory therapy in selected settings but do not recommend hsCRP-guided treatment after PCI. RIR therefore represents a clinically relevant post-PCI risk phenotype, but its transition from prognostic marker to actionable treatment target will require better definition of timing, inflammatory pathways, and the patients most likely to benefit from intervention.

More from our Archive