DOI: 10.3390/healthcare14131819 ISSN: 2227-9032

Reported Dietary Patterns in Pregnant Women with and Without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Post-Diagnosis Comparative Study in Guadalajara, Mexico

Andrea Paola Gómez-Maldonado, Laura Leticia Salazar-Preciado, Clío Chávez-Palencia, J. Jesús Pérez-Molina, Claudia Hunot-Alexander

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects between 1% and 14% of pregnancies worldwide. Major risk factors include advanced maternal age, excess adiposity, family history of type 2 diabetes, and unhealthy dietary habits. In Mexico, evidence on the association between dietary patterns and GDM remains scarce, particularly in socioeconomically vulnerable populations with limited access to specialized nutrition services. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dietary patterns and the presence of GDM in pregnant women attending the outpatient obstetrics clinic of a teaching public hospital in Guadalajara, México. Methods: We conducted a case–control study including 169 pregnant women: 71 with GDM confirmed by the ADA one-step 75 g oral glucose tolerance test OGTT criteria and 98 without GDM based on a negative OGTT, recruited consecutively from the same clinic during the same period. Dietary intake was assessed using a culturally adapted and validated Food Frequency Questionnaire. Dietary patterns were identified through Principal Component Analysis, and associations were examined using logistic regression adjusted for maternal age, pregestational BMI, and family history of type 2 diabetes. Results: Women with GDM had higher maternal age, greater pregestational BMI, and more frequent family history of type 2 diabetes compared with controls. Three dietary patterns were identified: Western, Healthy, and Dairy/Refined. High adherence to the Western pattern was inversely associated with GDM (aOR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16–0.78; p = 0.010); however, this finding most likely reflects post-diagnosis dietary modifications rather than a protective effect, while maternal age remained the strongest risk factor (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03–1.16; p = 0.002). The Healthy pattern (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.55–2.82; p = 0.593) and the Dairy/Refined pattern (aOR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.39–1.66; p = 0.554) were not significantly associated with GDM in the adjusted model. Conclusions: GDM was associated with older maternal age, higher pregestational BMI, and family history of T2DM. The inverse association with the Western pattern may reflect post-diagnosis dietary changes rather than a protective effect. Due to the retrospective design, causal inference is not possible, highlighting the need for longitudinal studies.

More from our Archive