Remaining Root Filling Material in Oval Canals After Retreatment Using MicroMega Remover and Reciproc Blue Systems with and Without Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation: A Micro-CT Study

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Reciproc Blue (RB) and MicroMega Remover (MR) systems in removing root canal filling material and to evaluate the effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) on remaining filling material (RFM) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) analysis. Methods: Forty single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth were included in the study. The root canals were prepared up to size F2 using the ProTaper Gold rotary file system and obturated with the lateral compaction technique. After the initial micro-CT scan, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups: Group RB, Group MR, Group RB + PUI, and Group MR + PUI (n = 10). Following retreatment, a second micro-CT scan was performed. The percentage of RFM was calculated, and statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction. A rank-based factorial analysis was additionally performed (p < 0.05). Results: RFM was observed in all groups. No significant difference was found between the RB (7.37%) and MR (7.31%) systems (p > 0.05). However, the groups treated with PUI (RB + PUI and MR + PUI) showed significantly lower RFM values than the groups without PUI (p = 0.001). Factorial analysis revealed no significant effect of file system or file system × PUI interaction, whereas PUI significantly reduced RFM (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The RB and MR systems demonstrated similar effectiveness in removing root canal filling material. Although complete canal cleanliness could not be achieved, under the in vitro conditions of the present study, PUI significantly reduced the amount of micro-CT-measured RFM.